Managing an Evaluation of Humanitarian Interventions in Fragile Areas

In a world marked by multifaceted crises, humanitarian interventions play a crucial role in saving lives and alleviating suffering. However, how can we be sure of their real effectiveness, especially in the most fragile areas? This is where evaluation comes into its own. It not only makes it possible to measure the impact of the actions taken, but also to guide future decisions to maximize results and avoid mistakes. However, evaluating these interventions is not just a necessity: it is a complex and multidimensional process, which must take into account the diversity of contexts, the variability of needs, as well as the multiple constraints on the ground. So what are the specific challenges to overcome and what methods can be used to conduct rigorous evaluation in these challenging environments? We will try to provide some answers in the following.

Steps in evaluating humanitarian responses

 The steps for the evaluation of humanitarian interventions in fragile areas are the same as evaluations in other contexts :

  • Planning : This is an essential step that provides an opportunity to define the objectives of the evaluation and  the indicators to be measured, to identify the stakeholders and the methods to be used taking into account local realities.
 
  • Data collection : Here, it is a question of preparing collection tools adapted to the targets and then carrying out surveys, conducting individual and/or group interviews to collect relevant information for the rest of the process.
 
  • Data analysis : Examine the data collected, compare it to the evaluation criteria based on the reference studies and draw conclusions.
 
  • Report and recommendations : Present the results in a clear and concise manner, with recommendations to improve future interventions.

Challenges in evaluating humanitarian interventions in fragile areas

Source : United Nations

When humanity is faced with crises, whether caused by conflict, natural disasters or epidemics, humanitarian interventions are essential to save lives and alleviate suffering. However, in fragile areas where infrastructure is destroyed, resources are limited and security is precarious, the evaluation of such interventions is particularly complex. The main challenges faced by evaluators in these contexts include:

  1. Restricted access to populations

In fragile areas, access to affected populations can be hampered by armed conflicts, checkpoints, weak or lack of network coverage, impassable roads or extreme weather conditions. Assessors should navigate with caution to reach vulnerable communities. In addition,  the affected communities may be reluctant to collaborate due to mistrust or past trauma. All of this makes it difficult to collect the accurate and comprehensive data needed to assess the impact of interventions.

2. Insecurity

Fragile areas are often the scene of armed conflict, violence and political instability. Evaluators risk their own lives or the lives of their teams to collect data in the field. With personal safety and protection of beneficiaries being major concerns, this makes it difficult to continuously monitor and evaluate humanitarian programs.

3. Complex coordination

The evaluation of humanitarian interventions involves multiple actors, such as NGOs, government agencies, the military and other security personnel, and international organizations. The fragile and insecure contexts also necessitates high coordination for a successful evaluation. Poor coordination can lead to inefficient use of resources from the field phase to biased or incomplete evaluation of interventions. As such, evaluators need to coordinate the efforts of all stakeholders to ensure successful completion of evaluation steps.

4. Limited Resources

Fragile areas often face a lack of essential resources such as water, food, medicine and basic infrastructure. This shortage has repercussions not only on the beneficiaries of interventions, but also on the logistical capacities of the evaluators. Data collection for the evaluation of humanitarian interventions can be seriously compromised due to the lack of adequate technology, communication and tools. In these contexts, evaluators must juggle limited resources to carry out their mission. They must be creative and resourceful to obtain reliable information despite the constraints.

Approach to Evaluating a Humanitarian Response in Fragile Areas

Source : Octopus Consulting and Insight

The evaluation of humanitarian interventions in fragile areas requires specific approaches to ensure quality and effectiveness. Here are the commonly used ones:

  • Rapid assessment: When an emergency situation arises, a rapid assessment is essential to provide basic information that guide initial decisions.  
 
  • Detailed assessment: If a humanitarian organisation is considering intervening in a new area, a more in-depth assessment is required to provide more detailed information to make informed decisions.
 
  • Adaptive approaches: In fragile contexts, evaluators must adapt quickly to changing conditions. Evaluating humanitarian interventions in fragile areas requires an agile and adaptive approach to ensure quality and accountability.
 
  • Uses of new technological equipment: The use of drones to map disaster areas, the analysis of massive and relevant data to predict crises, or the use of blockchain to ensure the traceability of aid, are all innovations that are revolutionizing humanitarian evaluation.
 
  • Ethical considerations and informed consent: The protection of data relating to vulnerable populations is a major concern. Initiatives like OCHA’s Humanitarian Data Exchange seek to set standards for ethical data sharing. In addition, informed consent poses particular challenges in crisis contexts.
 
  • Innovative approaches, such as the use of visual aids to explain assessment processes, are increasingly being adopted.
 
  • Local capacity building: Training local evaluators is essential for a thorough understanding of the context. Organizations such as ALNAP (Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Action) offer specialized training programs in this regard.

For us at Octopus, the training of the premises is an important step in this process. Training local evaluators is not only about transferring technical skills, but also about valuing the local knowledge that is essential for an evaluation. 

Recommendations for practical management of assessments in fragile contexts

For effective evaluation management in fragile contexts, here are some practical recommendations to consider.

  • Standardization of key metrics while allowing contextual flexibility.
 
  • Creation of regional expert pools for rapid and culturally relevant assessments.
 
  • Development of secure data sharing platforms between organizations.
 
  • Systematic integration of feedback into program design
 

Managing an evaluation of humanitarian interventions in fragile areas is a complex but essential challenge that requires constant adaptation. Assessors must carefully navigate logistical constraints, security risks, and the critical needs of affected populations. It is through these efforts that we can ensure that every resource invested in humanitarian assistance reaches its full potential to save and improve lives in the most difficult contexts. 

As experts, we must continue to promote robust assessment methods and maintain our commitment to humanity, because above all, every assessment is an opportunity for learning, reflection and continuous improvement. 

Leave A Comment